| QUOTE (RonnieIsBack @ Dec 19 2004, 05:00 AM) |
| Maybe they are doing it to get paid millions of dollars in government grants... |
It's very much more likely it's the other way around, especially in USA.
Sure, they have "points". Like I use to say that Greenland is called green-land because when it was discovered it was... green, and the reason it's completely icy today is due to natural weather changes. Another famous example is when a swedish king and his army on the 16th century crossed a big ice-plate to another island. Today we wonder how that happened as there's hardly any ice at all there.
This SHOULD be taken in consideration, but it's highly unlikely these fast changes we see now have anything to do with natural changes.
Believe me, I would love to believe you guys are right, but if the scientists are sure about their things, (and they've been reporting about these future problems BEFORE we got this intense amount natural disasters everywhere) I sure will believe them and not Bush's scientists.
| QUOTE |
The European Union wants to limit the amount of GH gases so that they can limit the economic powers that are rising in Asia (mostly China) and India. By cutting GH Gases they limit the production and growth of these new, fast rising, super powers because they (the EU) cannot keep up. They fear that with the United States of America already have a Mammoth lead in Arms, Economics, and Science that if they were to fail again to Asia, India, and eventually Russia that they will become more and more alientated and become worthless to these new Super Powers.
Maybe the Climate in Politics is more scary to them than the actual GH Gases.
Just a crazy Conspiracy Theory that has no meaning, but it makes you think I guess.
|
I don't know if I should laugh or cry, because it's really sad some people can be this dumb. For a starter, USA might have a "lead" over Europe, but anyone who think USA will still be a superpower in 20-30 years should take a good look on the reality. Asia will become very powerful, yes. But if Europe would try to stop asia from becoming too powerful it's even more stupid USA won't support the kyoto-protocole. I'm sure EU wouldn't want Asia to become too powerful, but we have much more environmental problems than they have, so why do we want sign the kyoto-protocole?
Even if you don't believe the man has made the environmental problems, you must realize something is happening that will end in a catastrophy. This is a problem that MUST be dealt with and not ignored, and not signing the kyoto-protocole is to ignoring the problem. Unfortunately it's the poor people that will suffer the most from the rich people's abuse.
